Training and the female hormone cycle…
What we know, what we hypothesise and what we don’t know.
Right now, there is almost nothing that we know with absolute certainty. This is for two reasons: first only 6% of sports science research is on women only, and second the majority of that research is poor quality since it did not measure female hormones, but guessed by “phase” (with their wildly changing hormone levels, “phases” such as luteal, follicular, have no place in sports science).
Given the significant variation from one woman to the next this is simply hormone roulette, which since the entire purpose of the research is to understand the effect of hormones on sport means we cannot accept the results. The good news is that some of the top sports scientists were as annoyed by this as I am and wrote this timely paper: Why We Must Stop Assuming and Estimating Menstrual Cycle Phases in Laboratory and Field-Based Sport Related Research
The other good-ish news is that we have a lot of research about the physiological effects of female hormones from other fields. For instance we know that progesterone increases body temperature and respiration rate. These are established facts. As we know how rising and falling levels affect the body, we can hypothesise the effects on training, recovery and adaptation. For now that’s the best we’ve got.
Oestrogen: a possible performance ally?
Oestrogen levels rise in the first half of the cycle, peak just before ovulation, and then climb again moderately in the second half. During those higher-oestrogen windows, athletes may notice subtle boosts in how they perform and recover.
Why?
Muscle recovery: oestrogen has anti-inflammatory effects, potentially reducing muscle damage after exercise.
Antioxidant protection: it may help to buffer oxidative stress from hard efforts or high training loads.
Fuel use: it nudges metabolism toward greater fat oxidation and carbohydrate sparing, useful for endurance performance.
Neuromuscular function: some studies suggest improved coordination and force production when oestrogen is elevated.
Together, these effects may make hard sessions feel smoother, recovery more efficient, and sustained efforts more economical, though individual experiences vary widely.
Progesterone: possibly not that beneficial for some athletes?
Progesterone stays low until ovulation, then rises through the second half of the cycle. While essential for overall health and hormonal balance, higher progesterone levels might make training feel harder.
Possible effects include:
Higher core temperature: the thermogenic effect can accelerate fatigue, especially in heat.
Catabolic tendencies: it may dampen muscle repair and/or adaptation, countering oestrogen’s protective role.
Central fatigue: as a CNS depressant, it can lower motivation and alertness.
Cardiovascular strain: higher ventilation and heart rate responses can make the same workload feel more taxing.
Respiration: faster respiration rate combined with a higher sensitivity to carbon dioxide can make zone 4-5 work feel much harder (the complex interplay between brain and body might mean that the signals that tell us we are working hard are louder or occur sooner).
When progesterone dominates, particularly if oestrogen is low, some athletes describe feeling flatter or less responsive to training. Progesterone levels are highly variable so it’s possible that women who do experience this simply have higher levels.
What this means in practice - an emerging hypothesis:
Performance potential and recovery may depend less on fixed cycle phases and more on relative hormone levels. Training that aligns (when possible) with more favourable hormonal conditions, or at least recognises when the body may need extra support, could help optimise adaptation over time.
Right now, the science isn’t definitive enough for precise prescriptions, but awareness matters. Tracking symptoms and patterns can help athletes and coaches interpret fluctuations in performance or motivation without defaulting to “I’m just off today” or panicking about sudden apparent loss of fitness. Over time, those observations can guide training load, recovery emphasis, and nutrition strategies.
So next time you see a post telling you to “lift heavy in the follicular phase” remember that “the follicular phase” includes the days of your lowest overall hormones and the highest peak of oestrogen so it is, scientifically-speaking, nonsense.
For science-backed, compassionate coaching join Ultra Potential